What it’s about

In this paper, we examine the claim that we can “read” artworks and evaluate what is psychometrically required for such measurement claims to be valid and interpretable.

Abstract

This article offers a psychometric commentary on the possibility of measuring artwork attributes. It focuses on the conceptual and measurement assumptions needed to support inferences about what can be extracted from artworks through assessment. The discussion highlights construct-definition issues, score-interpretation limits, and the importance of formal measurement models when evaluating claims about art-based judgments. The paper argues for tighter psychometric framing in this domain to improve theoretical clarity and empirical validity.

How to access the paper

Go to the journal page for this article here.

Download the PDF here.