What it’s about

In this paper, we study the processes through which non-expert judges improve creativity evaluations after training.

Abstract

Evaluating creativity reliably is a central challenge in creativity research and practice. This study examines training procedures for non-expert judges and analyzes the mechanisms associated with improved judgment quality. The results clarify how exposure and calibration processes can enhance evaluation consistency and validity. Implications are discussed for creativity assessment contexts that rely on human raters.

How to access the paper

Go to the journal page for this article here.

Download the PDF here.